The quote makes interesting reading (pages 1-7) I'll post more once I have fully digested it.







The total ex vat is 8,691.94. An additional 5,110.60 for installation if required.
The finding, planning, financing and building of a small house in Portobello
"Believe and act as if it were impossible to fail"
"The only time you can afford to fail is the last time you try"
"Imagine a new category of land use - Permaculture Land (Pc Land). This is land used for permaculture - sustainable self-reliant agriculture and horticulture in which work, house building, leisure, growing food, rearing animals, education, renewable energy, recycling and nature conservation are integrated in an infinite number of ways. The essence of Pc Land would be that there is a contractual relationship between the owner and the local/national authorities. This states, basically:
'I will buy and live on just this piece of land.
I will not buy several plots and speculate.
I will not let it out.
I will conserve energy and nature in line with a permaculture design.
I will plant over 20 trees per acre.
I will co-operate with my neighbours over transport, infrastructure, power generation, waste disposal, water harvesting and supply, and common land.
In return for the freedom to build my own house in the style I choose I will do without additional connections to mains water, electricity, sewerage or road systems.'
Planning authorities would be given the power to designate any area Pc Land, whether it was previously industrial, agricultural, military or even residential land. Conditions would be put on the number of dwellings per acre (maybe a maximum of two), roads and vehicles, and a height limit of structures appropriate to the site - say 10 metres. Authorities would be encouraged to designate areas of several square miles, or large zones of Pc Land. These could be areas currently suffering the effects of monoculture, depopulation, inadequate housing or chronic unemployment. Disused military bases could be designated Pc Land. Any farmer or landholder could apply to change from agricultural land to Pc Land, and there would be a presumption in favour of acceptance.
The consequences of this small change to planning law would of course be enormous, and I invite you to use your imagination with me...."
My sister and brother are going to do a site survey. My sister is an architect and my brother a man of leisure with degrees in both engineering and architecture so this is not beyond their wit...
Here is what I am going to ask them to do.
1. A full measured survey of the existing site and buildings (with photographs as required - to explain junctions etc). This should be to enough detail that we can build with confidence from it - order a timber frame to exact dimensions etc - accuracy to 2mm.
2. Two ground condition trial pits with photographs. These should be at least 1m deep, outside of the location of the proposed foundations, one should be near the tree to check for how extensive the root ball is and to assess the potential for foundation disturbance. The other one should be somewhere else on the site. Look for and photgraph, soil type (sand or clay or gravel etc - my guess and hope is sandy gravel as its near the beach). Also note any other 'things' in the ground that may effect construction; rock, toxins (chemical leaks etc), artefacts, big holes, pipes, etc.
3. A heights survey of the land and surrounding roads. This will be used to assess drainage and foundation heights. It should be accurate to about 10mm. see following steps for more detail:
One person works the theodolyte (A), the other is assitant (B). B holds vertically at two vertices a pole that must be at least as high as the theodolite's lens and have a perpendicular bubble level (or use a level held against the pole). The pole must be ruled to correspond to the height of the theodolite lens - be clearly readable through the theodolite's eyepiece. Measure the baseline distance between the pole and the theodlyte using a measuring tape.
Now measure the height
Move the pole, place and level the theodolite over it, and use the theodolite's optical plummet or, in its absence, a dangling weight, to center on the hole. Now do the same again to a new point.
Basically you get a two wheelies - a green one for everyday trash and
There are an additional two recycling crates, one is for glass and tin cans,
(There are on street recycling bins for plastics and papers and any other
The wheelies are 600mm wide by 750mm deep and 1100mm high.
The small crates are 570mm wide by 450mm deep by 350mm high.
Thanks and credit to my sister!
What do you need to send?
(1) a completed copy of the “NEIGHBOUR NOTIFICATION” form provided with the application form;
(2) a copy of a location plan showing the site of the proposed development.
(3) a copy of the guidance note “ADVICE TO NEIGHBOURS”.
If the neighbouring property is DOMESTIC (a house/flat), 2 copies of each of the above 3 items must be sent, one addressed to “The Owner” and the other to “The Occupier”.
If the neighbouring property is NON-DOMESTIC, a copy of each of the above
In my case this would be like this:
I'm starting to feel that Edinburgh and the UK in general are too over regulated. Not that I disagree with the points made here its just... well have a read of the edited version (the real thing is 8 pages long):
CITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT QUALITY HANDBOOK
Colour of Buildings
Approved
Local plan policies promote high quality design and protect the character and appearance of listed buildings and conservation areas. For example, policy CD19 of the Central Edinburgh Local Plan states:
“The Council will permit alterations and extensions to buildings which in their design and form, choice of materials and positioning are compatible with the character of the original building, will not result in an unreasonable loss of privacy or natural light to neighbouring properties and are not detrimental to neighbourhood amenity and character. Particular attention will be paid to ensuring that works to listed buildings and non listed buildings within conservation areas do not damage their special character”.
■ SCOPE OF GUIDANCE
This guideline applies city-wide to proposals for new buildings or to change the colour of existing buildings.
a) The predominant materials and colours of existing good quality neighbouring buildings should generally be reflected in the choice of colours for new development. Colours should reflect, complement and be part of the design characteristics of the new building and the streetscene in general. Large areas of incongruous colours which are not “earth colours” or “natural colours” must be avoided. Stone and brick walls should not be painted.
b) In areas where the Scottish Vernacular style predominates, there is scope for allowing a more innovative treatment such as the use of coloured rendering on facades, although it will usually be inappropriate to use strong, non-traditional colours on large and prominent areas of walls and roofs.
(ii) Contrasting shades of colour can help to accentuate and link proportions between new and old buildings, give variety and interest, and help to break the scale of bulky elevational compositions. They can also help to enliven the streetscene.
(iii) Architectural details can be picked out in neutral tones or highlighted to contrast with their background.
(iv) Buildings that have roofs darker than their walls tend to create a more stable and robust effect and are encouraged.
(v) For major new buildings and complexes in a modern style, the choice of colours should reflect the context but also be an intrinsic part of the architectural design concept. In such cases, colours of buildings will be assessed on their individual merits, taking into account texture/context and aesthetic balance.
(vi) Innovative schemes of demonstrable quality may justify a departure from recommended guidance, and provided they are acceptable in the context of their surroundings
2.9.4 Escape windows (E2.17)
The normal means of escape from a dwelling in the event of a fire will be by way of the internal stairs or other circulation areas.
In order to provide the occupants with early warning of the outbreak of fire, mains operated fire detection should be installed in circulation routes (see guidance to standard 2.11). The early detection of smoke should allow the occupants sufficient time to evacuate the building safely. However in some cases the circulation area may become impassable due to smoke or heat and openable windows large enough to escape through should be provided from every apartment from which the occupants could make their escape by lowering themselves from the window.
The use of an escape window will be the last resort for the occupants and inevitably involves some risk.
An escape window should be provided in every apartment on an upper storeyat a height of not more than 4.5 m. In addition, escape windows should also be provided in every apartment that is an inner room on any storey at a height of not more than 4.5 m. Escape windows are not necessary from apartments where there are alternative routes from the apartment to circulation areas or other rooms.
Escape windows should be a window, or door (french window) situated in an external wall or roof; and having an unobstructed openable area that is at least 0.33 m2 and at least 450 mm high and 450 mm wide (the route through the window maybe at an angle rather than straight through). The bottom of the openable area should not be more than 1100 mm above the floor.
Locks and safety fittings for many types of windows continue to present practical difficulties. This is because the design of the fittings needs to consider child safety, safe cleaning and security as well as escape in the event of a fire. At present there is no guidance provided on the type of lock or fastening that can provide both security and escape, and the occupants of dwellings can choose to fit devices most suitable for their situation. Devices that should be prohibited are permanent obstructions such as fixed security grills. The intention is to assist escape, but not to prohibit the use of locks, restrictors or other safety devices.
"a house that would be acknowledged as a reference for the renovation of the architectural language"
Biff | posted on 05-11-06 |
...it's obvious which windows are double glazed and which single. But the real issue over maintaining the architectural heritage of British townscapes is the width of glazing bars. Through much of the 18th and 19th centuries these were tpically about 20mm, sometimes even slimmer. For a standard insulated glazed unit, a rebate of about 12mm is requires to hide the seal, both for aesthetic reasons and to protect the seal from uv-light. A 12mm rebate either side of the glazing bar plus 6mm of timber between the units adds up to about 30mm for the width of the bar. This really is a practical minimum and many manufacturers make the bars nearer 40mm. While this might not look out of place in a Queen Anne or early 18th century building it really makes a difference to the appearance of many later buildings. Applying thin fake glazing bars to the outside surfaces of a large continuous igu, with corresponding bars inserted between the panes, gives a semblance of the traditional pattern but is, nevertheless, a fake and does little for the respect of historic fabric. The glue used to bond the bars to the glass probably has a limited life. The appearance of windows replaced by modern units is further compromised by the ubiquitous use of float glass. Its optically flat and parallel surfaces gives a dull and lifeless character, quite different from the movement created by cylinder or crown glass. Crown glass, in particular, is completely irreplaceable. The skills employed in making it have been lost, perhaps permanently. To remove a piece of crown glass and replace it with float is, in my opinion, akin to throwing away a piece of antique furniture or old masters painting and replacing them with self assembly flatpack furniture and prints from IKEA. Hand made, mouth blown, cylinder glass is still made at a couple of factories in Europe but if folk knew the cost they might be less ready to break their old windows. With the growing awareness that global warming is the greatest threat that humanity has ever faced, there is obvious pressure to throw out anything that is thought to be energy profligate. However, that our irreplaceable historic heritage should be the first victim of our effort to live sustainably, is a tradgedy that cannot be repaired. There are other more energy efficient routes to be travelled first. I would recommend Richard Heinberg's book, Powerdown, and particularly the chapter, Building Lifeboats - The Path of Community Solidarity and Preservation, as a particularly pertinent contribution to the debate. Let us build sustainably, and let us convert our existing housing stock to be fit for sustainable living, but let us not destroy our heritage and the beauty that our forefathers have left us. It was not the 18th century lifestyle not resulted in global warming. |
The "preliminary plans" are the very crux of the architect's contribution. They embody the over-all conception of the building and represent a complete synthesis of the architect's gifts, schooling, and experience. They should be the result of minute and lengthy studies of functional, structural, financial, and cultural problems entailed by the human needs and physical and financial limitations involved in the building.
It is for this main creative effort that the architect earns the smallest portion of his fee...
The architect must realize the importance of his contribution and demand sufficient payment to permit proper performance. However, building is already overburdened with the charges listed above, and must be relieved. It is senseless for a family to spend years saving for the "down payment" and then occupy "their" shelter burdened with twenty years of debt bondage.
The only solution, both for the owner's over-indebtedness and for the architect's under-compensation, is for the architect to take charge of all building processes himself. His designs should include interiors and landscapes, to be executed by experts and subcontractors working under the architect's guidance ( In the planning of "contemporary" buildings, this procedure is a necessity.)
Complete management of building operations will not add much to the architect's tasks if he is in the habit of supervising properly, and need increase the percentage rate of his fee only slightly. It will bring him into closer contact with craftsmen and give him greater knowledge and control of costs...